From 0a0c3ca49dbaec5980d3262c41a8a72977a51efb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Melissa Wen Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:36:42 -0200 Subject: [PATCH] [oss-2018] abstract --- oss2018/content/00-abstract.tex | 19 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/oss2018/content/00-abstract.tex b/oss2018/content/00-abstract.tex index 2a69912..e86ff49 100644 --- a/oss2018/content/00-abstract.tex +++ b/oss2018/content/00-abstract.tex @@ -1,15 +1,14 @@ \begin{abstract} -In this paper, we examined the case of a 30-month government-academia -development collaboration to map empirical practices that harmonized the -differences in open source software project management on both sides. We -evidence our adopted practices from the data collected on the repository -management tool of the developed platform itself. The benefits of the created empirical -management model in this project are revealed by the results of surveys -with participants on both sides of the project. These results suggest the -adoption of empirical practices based on open source ecosystems and agile -methodologies to improve the software development in context with different -organizational culture and people mindset. +Government and academia can collaborate on bringing innovation and filling +design-reality gaps in e-government projects. However, differences in the +methods employed by these organizations in project management could be a +challenge for collaborative works. Bearing that in mind, we investigated a +30-month government-academia partnership case to find appropriate ways to +get around this obstacle. The analisis of \textit{post-mortem} data and the +results of a survey with participants of this project allowed us to present +a set of best open source practices that favors team management in +collaborations between the abovementioned organizations. \end{abstract} -- libgit2 0.21.2