diff --git a/oss2018/content/03-methods.tex b/oss2018/content/03-methods.tex
index 3fcdb27..d8cbc94 100644
--- a/oss2018/content/03-methods.tex
+++ b/oss2018/content/03-methods.tex
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ questions that guided our work:
 \textbf{RQ1. }\textit{How to introduce open source and agile best practices into
 government-academia collaboration projects?}
 
-\textbf{RQ2. }\textit{What practices would favor effective team management in
+\textbf{RQ2. }\textit{What practices favor effective team management in
 government-academia collaborative projects?}
 
 To answer these questions, we use the case study as research method. We selected
diff --git a/oss2018/content/04-results.tex b/oss2018/content/04-results.tex
index 7abcec1..39cb851 100644
--- a/oss2018/content/04-results.tex
+++ b/oss2018/content/04-results.tex
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ practices that made these decisions concrete. We use data collected from the
 central repository to map best practices and, with the respondents' answers, we
 analyzed how each decision benefited the project collaboration.
 
-The development team decides to \textbf{use of the system under development to
+The development team decided to \textbf{use of the system under development to
 develop the system itself}.  The team released the first version of the new SPB
 portal nine months after the project beginning. Due to the platform features
 for software development and social network, the development coordinators decided to
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ well as in the portal itself. When necessary, we can access the tools and find
 out how we develop a solution. We can recover these positive points.''}.
 
 
-The development coordinator works to \textbf{brings together government staff
+The development coordinators worked to \textbf{brings together government staff
 and development team}.  At the beginning of the project, the interviewed MPOG
 analysts did not participate in any direct interaction with any university
 representative, even though they were the ones in charge of the government in
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ qualified, the code had quality, and the project was well executed. So in
 practice, our difficulty interpreting the technical details did not impact
 release planning.''}.
 
-The technical leaders \textbf{divide the development team into priority fronts,
+The project leaders \textbf{divided the development team into priority fronts,
 and for each one, hire at least one specialist from the IT market}.  The
 development team had four work areas divided by the main demands of the
 project: User Experience, DevOps, Integration of Systems, and Social
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ their previous experiences. In contrast, {62.5\%} of them did not understand
 the MPOG's project management process and {50\%} believed this process could
 affect their project productivity.
 
-Senior developers were also responsible for \textbf{improving the management
+The senior developers were also responsible for \textbf{improving the management
 and technical knowledge} of the interns about practices from industry and open
 source projects. {91\%} of the interns believed that working with professionals
 was essential for learning. Working with senior developers was important during
--
libgit2 0.21.2