From dedbe80422a65f240a73cab84ae3c91fcaf7e053 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paulo Meirelles Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:59:35 -0200 Subject: [PATCH] [oss-2018] Uptading abstract --- oss2018/content/00-abstract.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/oss2018/content/00-abstract.tex b/oss2018/content/00-abstract.tex index 222c754..dcf419d 100644 --- a/oss2018/content/00-abstract.tex +++ b/oss2018/content/00-abstract.tex @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ \begin{abstract} -Government and academia can collaborate on bringing innovation and filling design-reality gaps in e-government projects. However, differences in project management methods employed by the organizations is often a challenge for collaborative works. Bearing that in mind, we investigated a 30-month government-academia partnership to find appropriate ways to get around this obstacle. From the analysis of \textit{post-mortem} data as well as the results of questionnaires and interviews with project participants, we present a set of best practices based on open source and agile software development approaches that favors team management in government-academia collaborations in e-government development projects. +Government and academia can collaborate on bringing innovation and filling design-reality gaps in e-government projects. However, differences in project management methods employed by the organizations is often a challenge for collaborative works. Bearing that in mind, we investigated a 30-month government-academia partnership to find appropriate ways to get around this obstacle. From the analysis of \textit{post-mortem} data as well as the results of questionnaires and interviews with project participants, we present a set of best practices based on FLOSS and agile software development approaches that favors team management in government-academia collaborations in e-government development projects. \end{abstract} -- libgit2 0.21.2