05-architecture.tex
6.18 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
\section{Architecture}
\label{sec:architecture}
Based on the great list of functional requirements desired by Brazilian Federal
Government we decided to select some FOSS systems that already contemplate some
of them and improve these systems. And bringing the idea of community, it is
undoable build a platform to be used by communities, which is a complex
scenario, using just one tool.
At the point of view of the architecture, two main requirements was brought by
the Brazilian Federal Government for the new platform:
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textit{Integrate existing FOSS systems}, with minimal differences from
their original versions;
\item \textit{Provide a consistent user interface} across the different
systems, as well as centralized authentication.
\end{enumerate}
Adopting existing FOSS systems by the government could bring the benefit of
improvements done by the upstream communities, and the maintenance effort. On
the other hand, integrating different tools with distinct intent, it is not an
easy task and it was important to have a consistent user interface which
justifies the last requirement.
For the first requirement, we identified four main systems that required
specialized teams for work in the integration process. The teams learned how to
develop for their assigned systems and contributed to the original
communities, so that the version we used were not significantly different from
the original. Unfortunately, the deadlines at the end of the project forced us
to use our own version before the features were fully reviewed and integrated
into the upstream of the project.
At the end of the project, SPB portal was composed of more than ten systems
among them we can highlight: Colab, Noosfero, Mezuro, Gitlab, Mailman, Postfix,
Munin, and so forth. The following sections explained a little bit of Colab,
Noosfero, Mezuro and Gitlab (the main tools which we contributed). Later, we
described how we integrated those tools and conclude with the deployment.
\subsection{Colab}
For the second requirement, we decided to use a web integration platform named
Colab\footnote{\url{https://github.com/colab/colab}}. It works as a frontend
for other web applications as a reverse proxy, manages authentication, and can
apply changes to the HTML provided by the integrated applications in order to
bring visual consistency.
Initially, Colab had support for a small set of applications (Trac, GNU
Mailman, Apache Lucene) and all of them was hard-coded; our team evolved Colab
so that it can now receive plugins to add support for new applications with
minimal changes to its existing core. We developed plugins to be used in the
SPB platform: Noosfero, GitLab, and Mezuro.
\subsection{Noosfero}
Noosfero\footnote{\url{http://noosfero.org/}} is a software for building
social and collaboration networks. Besides the classical social
networking features, it also provides publication features such as blogs
and a general-purpose CMS (Content Management System). Most of the user
interactions with SPB is through Noosfero: user registration, project
home pages and documentation, and contact forms.
\subsection{Gitlab and Mezuro}
GitLab\footnote{\url{http://gitlab.com/}} is a web-based Git repository
manager with wiki pages and issue tracking features.
Mezuro\footnote{\url{http://mezuro.org/}} is a platform to collect source code
metric to monitor the internal quality of softwares written in C, C++,
Java, Python, Ruby, and PHP. GNU Mailman is used for mailing lists.
\subsection{System unification}
\begin{figure}[hbt]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/arch.png}
\caption{SPB architecture overview.}
\label{fig:architecture}
\end{figure}
The conceptual architecture of the platform is presented in Figure
\ref{fig:architecture}. Colab initially handles all user interaction,
directing requests to one of the integrated applications. It
post-processes responses from the applications to apply a consistent
visual appearance, manages authentication, and provides a unified search
functionality: instead of using the redundant restricted search
functionality of each application, a search in the SPB portal might
return content from any of the applications, be it web pages, mailing
list posts, or source code.
% Falar do devops
\subsection{Deploy}
The SPB platform was deployed in 7 virtual machines with different functions,
as we can see in Figure \ref{fig:architecture2}.
\begin{figure*}[hbt]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/arch2.png}
\caption{Instanciation view of the SPB architecture.}
\label{fig:architecture2}
\end{figure*}
The \textit{reverseproxy} handles the HTTP requests and redirects them to the
\textit{integration}, the \textit{email} sends and receives e-mails on behalf
of the platform and the \textit{monitor} keeps the entire environment tracked.
These three \textit{VMs} mentioned - \textit{reverseproxy}, \textit{email} and
\textit{monitor} - are accessible via Internet and the other ones are only
available in the local network created between them.
\textit{Integration} works as a second layer of proxy beneath
\textit{reverseproxy}, any request to the platform will be handled by it. The
Colab service provides interface, authentication and search engine integration
among all the services. When a request is received to a specific service,
Colab authenticates the user in the target tool, sends the request and makes a
visual transformation in the HTML page which is the content of the response.
Another user-oriented feature is the integrated search engine, when the user
want to find something in the platform Colab will perform the search in the
whole databases. Colab itself provides a web interface for GNU Mailman and we
have two others integrated tools in \textit{integration}: Gitlab and Prezento.
Gitlab provides web interface for Git repositories and issues tracker, and
Prezento is a front-end for source code static analysis.
The source code static analysis is performed by \textit{mezuro}. It runs some
static analysis tools on source code stored in repository and provide this data
to Prezento. A social network and CMS (Content Manager System) is provided by
Noosfero in \textit{social}, and the databases of all tools with a cache
service are in \textit{database}.