Commit 5233528fc7d865d3340f28034d1ad7de0d3d16b2
1 parent
f5ba1f66
Exists in
master
and in
3 other branches
reviewing the Requirements section
Showing
1 changed file
with
60 additions
and
26 deletions
Show diff stats
opensym2017/content/03-requirements.tex
... | ... | @@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ government promote 3 events to collect the requirements, in particular from |
12 | 12 | society point of view: (i) an online form to collect general ideas; (ii) a |
13 | 13 | face-to-face meeting with society in general; (iii) a workshop to review the |
14 | 14 | SPB concepts and requirements with IT stockholders from the Brazilian |
15 | -government and public organization. | |
15 | +government and public organizations. | |
16 | 16 | |
17 | -After these 3 rounds discussing the new SPB Portal, Brazilian government listed | |
18 | -about 145 requirements and developed and mind | |
17 | +After these 3 rounds discussing the new SPB platform, the Brazilian government listed | |
18 | +about 145 requirements and developed a mind | |
19 | 19 | model\footnote{\url{https://softwarepublico.gov.br/social/spb/gallery/mapaconceitual.png}} |
20 | 20 | to guide the SPB portal evolution. In this scenario, the 10 most voted |
21 | -requirements are: | |
21 | +requirements are, for example: | |
22 | 22 | |
23 | 23 | \begin{enumerate} |
24 | 24 | |
... | ... | @@ -29,16 +29,16 @@ requirements are: |
29 | 29 | \item Search software by features. |
30 | 30 | \item Integration with social networks. |
31 | 31 | \item Repository for future ideas and requirements. |
32 | -\item Friendly URL to access a public software community pages. | |
32 | +\item Friendly URL to access a public software community page. | |
33 | 33 | \item User feedback about a public software. |
34 | -\item Experience report about the use of a public software. | |
34 | +\item Report of the experience about the use of a public software. | |
35 | 35 | |
36 | 36 | \end{enumerate} |
37 | 37 | |
38 | 38 | \begin{figure}[hbt] |
39 | 39 | \centering |
40 | 40 | \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/technological-requirements.png} |
41 | - \caption{Technological requirement overview.} | |
41 | + \caption{Technological requirements overview.} | |
42 | 42 | \label{fig:requirements} |
43 | 43 | \end{figure} |
44 | 44 | |
... | ... | @@ -47,43 +47,77 @@ Moreover, there were other requirements based on the experience of the IT |
47 | 47 | stakeholders from the Brazilian government and from the Brazilian FOSS |
48 | 48 | community (that UnB and USP were representing too in this project). The new |
49 | 49 | platform just could work properly if there is a unique authentication to use |
50 | -the set of tools that could provide features to cover. Additionally, a unified | |
50 | +the provided tools. Additionally, a unified | |
51 | 51 | interface was an important non-functional requirement to make easy the user |
52 | 52 | experience into the new platform. |
53 | 53 | |
54 | -At the first moment, we wish to release a initial version to replace the old | |
55 | -SPB portal. For that, the first version available in production needed to | |
56 | -provide some features: | |
54 | +At the first moment, we wish to release an initial version to replace the old | |
55 | +SPB portal. For that, the first version must have some features such as: | |
57 | 56 | |
58 | 57 | \begin{enumerate} |
59 | 58 | |
60 | 59 | \item Organized public software catalog. |
61 | -\item Social network environment (profile for users, software pages, and community pages). | |
60 | +\item Social network environment (profiles for users, software pages, and community pages). | |
62 | 61 | \item Content Management Systems (CMS) features. |
63 | 62 | \item Web-based Git repository manager with wiki and issue tracking features. |
64 | 63 | \item Mailing lists and discussion forums. |
65 | 64 | |
66 | 65 | \end{enumerate} |
67 | 66 | |
68 | -Other requirements also were planned during the conceptual phase of the SPB | |
67 | +Other requirements also were planned during the conception phase of the SPB | |
69 | 68 | evolution project such as an integrated search engine and a web-based source |
70 | -code static analysis. Therefore, by analyzing all of these requirements, we | |
71 | -propose a technological requirement overview, illustrated in Figure | |
72 | -\ref{fig:requirements} to guide the development of the new SPB platform once we | |
73 | -have designed this project to be built based on existing FOSS tools. However, the integration of several existing systems implemented in different programming language and frameworks, providing unique authentication, interface apparency, and search engine, as well as, other back-end features, is not a trivial work. | |
74 | - | |
75 | - | |
76 | -The new SPB platform is fully an integrated environment, being very advanced comparing to other related projects and initiatives. For example, the USA government has a platform designed to improve access to the federal government developed software. Code.gov is an interface to organize the USA government projects and, in short, make easy that their users and developers obtain some information and access their source code repositories on GitHub. However, there are not social networking and CMS features, as well as, other communication resources provided by the platform. | |
69 | +code static analysis monitor. Therefore, by analyzing all of these | |
70 | +requirements, we propose the technological requirements overview, as | |
71 | +illustrated in Figure \ref{fig:requirements}, to guide the development of the | |
72 | +new SPB platform. In other words, we have designed the SPB evolution project | |
73 | +based on existing FOSS tools. However, the integration of several existing | |
74 | +systems that already was implemented in different programming language and | |
75 | +frameworks, adding features such as a unique authentication, a unified | |
76 | +interface, and a search engine, as well as, other back-end features, is not a | |
77 | +trivial work. | |
78 | + | |
79 | +The new SPB platform is fully an integrated environment, as we can see in | |
80 | +Figure \ref{git:requirements}, being very advanced comparing to other related | |
81 | +projects and initiatives. For example, the USA government has a platform | |
82 | +designed to improve access to the federal government developed software. | |
83 | +Code.gov is an interface to organize the USA government projects and, in short, | |
84 | +make easy that their users and developers obtain some information and access | |
85 | +their source code repositories at GitHub. However, there are not social | |
86 | +networking and CMS features, as well as, other communication resources provided | |
87 | +by that platform. | |
77 | 88 | %https://code.gov |
78 | 89 | |
79 | -There are two initiatives from Europe: OSOR and OW2. The Open Source Observatory (OSOR) is a community hosted in JoinUp that is a environment powered by the European Commission. OSOR aims exchanging information, experiences and best practices around open source solutions for use in public administrations. Summarily, it helps to find an open source software made available by other public administrations, providing access to information such as news, events, studies and solutions related to implementation of open source software. It also offers forum discussions and community mailing lists, but it does not have an integrated source code repository manager once for the each project has a link to its own external repository (or its tarball file). | |
90 | +Also, there are two initiatives in Europe: OSOR and OW2. The Open Source | |
91 | +Observatory (OSOR) is a community hosted in the JoinUp platform powereded by | |
92 | +the European Commission. OSOR aims exchanging information, experiences and best | |
93 | +practices around FOSS solutions for use in public administrations. Summarily, | |
94 | +it helps to find an FOSS made available by other public administrations, | |
95 | +providing access to information such as news, events, studies and solutions | |
96 | +related to implementation of open source software. It also offers forum | |
97 | +discussions and community mailing lists, but it does not have an integrated | |
98 | +source code repository manager and for the each project has a link to its own | |
99 | +external repository (or its tarball file). | |
80 | 100 | %https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/osor |
81 | -OW2 is a FOSS community to promote the development of FOSS middleware, generic business applications, cloud computing platforms and foster a community and business ecosystem. In short, it aims to facilitate the development, deployment and management of distributed applications with a focus on FOSS middleware and related development and management tools. | |
101 | +OW2 is a FOSS community to promote the development of FOSS middleware, generic | |
102 | +business applications, cloud computing platforms and foster a community and | |
103 | +business ecosystem. In short, it aims to support the development, deployment | |
104 | +and management of distributed applications with a focus on FOSS middleware and | |
105 | +related development and management tools. | |
82 | 106 | %http://ow2.org |
83 | -Moreover, in the past, there were the QualiPSo project to provide to FOSS users, developers, and consumers, quality resources and expertise on the various topics related to free and open source software. That project have tried to develop a platform called QualiPSo Factory but it was not fully completed. | |
84 | - | |
85 | -In Latin American has an initiative based on the SPB project called Software Publico Regional. From the practical point of view, it provides a customized Gitlab instance to share the source code and documentation of the project from the involved countries. | |
107 | +Moreover, from the European Commission in 2007 until 20011, there were the | |
108 | +QualiPSo project that aims to provide to FOSS users, developers, and consumers, | |
109 | +quality resources and expertise on the various topics related to FOSS. The | |
110 | +QualiPSo project also have plained to develop a platform called QualiPSo | |
111 | +Factory but it was not fully completed. | |
112 | + | |
113 | +In Latin American has an initiative based on the SPB project called Software | |
114 | +Publico Regional. From the practical point of view, it provides a customized | |
115 | +Gitlab instance to share the source code and documentation of the project from | |
116 | +the involved countries. | |
86 | 117 | %http://softwarepublicoregionalbeta.net/ |
87 | -Such as Brazil, Chile has its own portal also called Software Publico. The user can create content in the communities (news items, documents, wiki pages), but all repository is available at the Bitbucket platform. | |
118 | +Such as Brazil, Chile has its own portal also called Software Publico. The user | |
119 | +can create content in the communities (news items, documents, wiki pages), but | |
120 | +all repository is available at the Bitbucket platform. | |
88 | 121 | %http://www.softwarepublico.gob.cl -> https://bitbucket.org/softwarepublico |
89 | 122 | |
123 | +%TODO: fazer o gancho final para linkar com a seção da arquitetura | ... | ... |