Commit a7be7be33d3e78c8a5dbb01c94155591b9e8684a
Committed by
Melissa Wen
1 parent
19ed65a9
Exists in
master
and in
3 other branches
revisando seção related projects
Showing
1 changed file
with
43 additions
and
40 deletions
Show diff stats
opensym2017/content/03-relatedworks.tex
@@ -2,62 +2,65 @@ | @@ -2,62 +2,65 @@ | ||
2 | \label{sec:related} | 2 | \label{sec:related} |
3 | 3 | ||
4 | The new SPB platform is a fully integrated environment, | 4 | The new SPB platform is a fully integrated environment, |
5 | -being very advanced in comparison with related projects and initiatives. | 5 | +very advanced in comparison with related initiatives. |
6 | % | 6 | % |
7 | For instance, the USA government has a platform designed to improve access to | 7 | For instance, the USA government has a platform designed to improve access to |
8 | -the federal government developed software\footnote{\url{https://code.gov}}. | ||
9 | -Code.gov is an interface to organize the USA government projects and, in short, | ||
10 | -make it easy for users and developers to obtain information and access their | ||
11 | -source code repositories at GitHub. However, there are not social networking | ||
12 | -and CMS features, as well as, other communication resources provided by that | ||
13 | -platform. | 8 | +federal government software\footnote{\url{https://code.gov}}. |
9 | +Code.gov is an interface to organize USA government projects, | ||
10 | +making it easy for users and developers to obtain information and to access their | ||
11 | +source code repositories at GitHub. However, it does not provide social networking | ||
12 | +and CMS features, as well as, other communication resources. | ||
14 | 13 | ||
15 | Additionally, there are two initiatives in Europe: | 14 | Additionally, there are two initiatives in Europe: |
16 | OSOR\footnote{\url{https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/osor}} and | 15 | OSOR\footnote{\url{https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/osor}} and |
17 | OW2\footnote{\url{http://ow2.org}}. The Open Source Observatory (OSOR) is a | 16 | OW2\footnote{\url{http://ow2.org}}. The Open Source Observatory (OSOR) is a |
18 | community hosted in the JoinUp platform powered by the European Commission. | 17 | community hosted in the JoinUp platform powered by the European Commission. |
19 | -OSOR aims at exchanging information, experiences and best practices around the | ||
20 | -use of FLOSS in the public administration. It helps to find a FLOSS made | ||
21 | -available by other public administrations, providing access to information such | ||
22 | -as news, events, studies and solutions related to implementation of open source | ||
23 | -software. It also offers forum discussions and community mailing lists, but it | ||
24 | -does not have an integrated source code repository manager and for the each | ||
25 | -project there is a link to its own external repository (or its tarball file). | 18 | +OSOR intends to exchange information, experiences, and best practices around the |
19 | +use of FLOSS in the public administration. It supports the discovering of FLOSS projects made | ||
20 | +available by public agencies, providing information about these projects, such | ||
21 | +as news, events, studies, and solutions. | ||
22 | +It also offers discussion forums and community mailing lists. But it | ||
23 | +does not have an integrated source code repository manager, so for each | ||
24 | +project there is a link to its own external repository. | ||
26 | % | 25 | % |
27 | -OW2 is a FLOSS community to promote the development of FLOSS middleware, generic | ||
28 | -business applications, cloud computing platforms and foster a community and | ||
29 | -business ecosystem. In short, it aims to support the development, deployment | ||
30 | -and management of distributed applications with a focus on FLOSS middleware and | ||
31 | -related development and management tools. | ||
32 | - | ||
33 | -Moreover, in 2007 the European Comission published a study examined the impact | ||
34 | -the development and distribution of FLOSS by public bodies has on eGovernment | ||
35 | -services, the economy, and the information society \cite{ghosh2004}. And there | ||
36 | -was between 2007 until 2011 the QualiPSo project that aimed at providing FLOSS | ||
37 | -users, developers, and consumers, with quality resources and expertise on the | ||
38 | -various topics related to FLOSS. The QualiPSo project also had planned to | ||
39 | -develop a platform called QualiPSo Factory but it was not fully completed. | 26 | +OW2 is an organization that promotes the development, deployment and management |
27 | +of FLOSS middleware, generic | ||
28 | +business applications, and cloud computing platforms, besides fostering a community and | ||
29 | +business ecosystem around such projects. | ||
30 | + | ||
31 | +\leo{E aí, o que a OW2 tem a ver com o SPB?} | ||
32 | + | ||
33 | +Moreover, in 2007 the European Comission published a study examining the impact | ||
34 | +that the development and distribution of FLOSS by public agencies have on eGovernment | ||
35 | +services and the economy~\cite{ghosh2004}. And, from 2007 to 2011, there | ||
36 | +was the QualiPSo project, whose objective was to provide FLOSS | ||
37 | +users, developers, and consumers with resources and expertise on FLOSS quality. | ||
38 | +The QualiPSo project also had planned to | ||
39 | +develop a platform called QualiPSo Factory, but it was not fully completed. | ||
40 | 40 | ||
41 | Finally, in Latin American there is an initiative based on the SPB project | 41 | Finally, in Latin American there is an initiative based on the SPB project |
42 | -called ``Software Publico | ||
43 | -Regional''\footnote{\url{http://softwarepublicoregionalbeta.net}}. From a | ||
44 | -practical point of view, it provides a customized Gitlab instance to share the | ||
45 | -source code and documentation of the project from the involved countries. | 42 | +called ``Software Público |
43 | +Regional''\footnote{\url{http://softwarepublicoregionalbeta.net}}. | ||
44 | +It provides a customized Gitlab instance to share | ||
45 | +source code and documentation of projects developed by the involved countries. | ||
46 | % | 46 | % |
47 | -Like Brazil, Chile has its own portal also called ``Software | ||
48 | -Publico''\footnote{\url{http://www.softwarepublico.gob.cl}}. Users can create | ||
49 | -content in the communities (news items, documents, wiki pages), but source code | 47 | +Like Brazil, Chile has its own portal, called ``Repositorio Software |
48 | +Público''\footnote{\url{http://www.softwarepublico.gob.cl}}. In the communities of the portal, | ||
49 | +users can create content such as news, documents, and wiki pages, but source code | ||
50 | repositories are available at the Bitbucket | 50 | repositories are available at the Bitbucket |
51 | platform\footnote{\url{https://bitbucket.org/softwarepublico}}. | 51 | platform\footnote{\url{https://bitbucket.org/softwarepublico}}. |
52 | 52 | ||
53 | The Brazilian government needed to evolve the SPB platform that existed since | 53 | The Brazilian government needed to evolve the SPB platform that existed since |
54 | 2007. When we started this project, the SPB Portal had about 200 thousand | 54 | 2007. When we started this project, the SPB Portal had about 200 thousand |
55 | -registered users. For example, we could not just contact these users and ask | ||
56 | -them to register an account at Github as well. Moreover, after the Edward | ||
57 | -Snowden's case, the Brazilian government approved a specific law decree | ||
58 | -(8.135/2013) to rule its communication services, requiring the public | ||
59 | -administration to host its information systems to be provided by itself, what | ||
60 | -rules out usage of private platforms, specially ones provided by foreign | 55 | +registered users. We could not just do something like contacting these users and asking |
56 | +them to register an account at Github. Moreover, after the Edward | ||
57 | +Snowden's case, the Brazilian government issued a decree | ||
58 | +(8.135/2013) requiring public | ||
59 | +agencies to host their information systems by themselves, | ||
60 | +avoiding the usage of private platforms, especially the ones provided by foreign | ||
61 | companies. Therefore, we needed to develop our own solution to cover all the | 61 | companies. Therefore, we needed to develop our own solution to cover all the |
62 | requirements, producing a complete governmental integrated platform for | 62 | requirements, producing a complete governmental integrated platform for |
63 | collaborative software development. | 63 | collaborative software development. |
64 | + | ||
65 | +\leo{Me parece que o decreto fala sobre sistemas de comunicação. Acho que o foco era e-mail. Não me parece que o SPB tenha a ver com isso. A menos que se considere algo pelos fóruns... para refletir.} | ||
66 | + |