[icse18] Add a possible related work

Diego Araújo
1 parent f2e42ca6
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 0 deletions Show diff stats
icse2018/content/02-related_work.tex
@@ -3,3 +3,6 @@
 There are similar previous works that we will review here. Agile methods application on the Brazilian public sector are approached by \cite{melo2010adoccao,de2016using}, but both are experiences limited to pilot projects. Not production-ready one that will provide more accurate data with the real world. On \cite{alleman2003making} the authors describe a production deployment for the US government, but it focus on describing the methodology applied to address long term planning and value estimation. And again on \cite{anderson2005stretching} we see a production software development case and the adaptation proposal that we will follow in this article, but focused on a specific methodology, the CMMI.
 This article differentiates itself from others by describing a production level software development to the public sector, but unconstrained to any specific aspect of the agile methods or an specific project management methodology on the government side. The focus on this article will be the whole experience of adapting agile methods to the public sector.
+
+% TODO: if needed, we can add this paper as related work
+%% Staying Agile in Government Software Projects - reports how the agile culture and practices (XP and Scrum) were introduced in a development team working on a government project. Describes practices added, adapted and abandoned. They had a experienced small team that did not know agile. TODO: Not sure if any process had to be added/adapted/abandoned at the government side.
	@@ -3,3 +3,6 @@		@@ -3,3 +3,6 @@
3	There are similar previous works that we will review here. Agile methods application on the Brazilian public sector are approached by \cite{melo2010adoccao,de2016using}, but both are experiences limited to pilot projects. Not production-ready one that will provide more accurate data with the real world. On \cite{alleman2003making} the authors describe a production deployment for the US government, but it focus on describing the methodology applied to address long term planning and value estimation. And again on \cite{anderson2005stretching} we see a production software development case and the adaptation proposal that we will follow in this article, but focused on a specific methodology, the CMMI.	3	There are similar previous works that we will review here. Agile methods application on the Brazilian public sector are approached by \cite{melo2010adoccao,de2016using}, but both are experiences limited to pilot projects. Not production-ready one that will provide more accurate data with the real world. On \cite{alleman2003making} the authors describe a production deployment for the US government, but it focus on describing the methodology applied to address long term planning and value estimation. And again on \cite{anderson2005stretching} we see a production software development case and the adaptation proposal that we will follow in this article, but focused on a specific methodology, the CMMI.
4		4
5	This article differentiates itself from others by describing a production level software development to the public sector, but unconstrained to any specific aspect of the agile methods or an specific project management methodology on the government side. The focus on this article will be the whole experience of adapting agile methods to the public sector.	5	This article differentiates itself from others by describing a production level software development to the public sector, but unconstrained to any specific aspect of the agile methods or an specific project management methodology on the government side. The focus on this article will be the whole experience of adapting agile methods to the public sector.
		6	+
		7	+% TODO: if needed, we can add this paper as related work
		8	+%% Staying Agile in Government Software Projects - reports how the agile culture and practices (XP and Scrum) were introduced in a development team working on a government project. Describes practices added, adapted and abandoned. They had a experienced small team that did not know agile. TODO: Not sure if any process had to be added/adapted/abandoned at the government side.