Commit ca3c632b18dfdc4cb8f3ed43ad2b7e9498986f24
Exists in
master
and in
3 other branches
Merge branch 'master' of softwarepublico.gov.br:softwarepublico/articles
Showing
2 changed files
with
46 additions
and
44 deletions
Show diff stats
opensym2017/content/01-introduction.tex
... | ... | @@ -3,14 +3,13 @@ |
3 | 3 | |
4 | 4 | The Brazilian Government released in the year 2000 the Eletronic Government |
5 | 5 | program (eGov) aiming at democratizing information access and improving the |
6 | -public provision quality of service and information. In 2003, the Brazilian | |
7 | -President created a | |
6 | +public provision quality of service and information. In 2003, the Federal Government created a | |
8 | 7 | committee\footnote{\url{http://www.softwarelivre.gov.br/documentos-oficiais/ |
9 | 8 | DecretoComite}} for implementation of Free/Libre/Open Source Software |
10 | 9 | (FLOSS\footnote{In this work, the acronym ``FLOSS'' is used as a representative |
11 | 10 | for ``Free Software'', ``Open Source Software'' (OSS), and``Free/Open Source |
12 | -Software'' (FOSS).}) and thereafter the Chief of Staff of Brazil sent a | |
13 | -circular- letter to all Ministries in which the recommendation to adopt FLOSS | |
11 | +Software'' (FOSS).}) and thereafter a | |
12 | +circular-letter was sent to all Ministries in which the recommendation to adopt FLOSS | |
14 | 13 | became a public |
15 | 14 | policy\footnote{\url{http://www.softwarelivre.gov.br/documentos-oficiais/circulardoministro}}. |
16 | 15 | In 2007, the Brazilian Public Software Portal (\textit{Portal do Software | ... | ... |
opensym2017/content/03-relatedworks.tex
... | ... | @@ -2,62 +2,65 @@ |
2 | 2 | \label{sec:related} |
3 | 3 | |
4 | 4 | The new SPB platform is a fully integrated environment, |
5 | -being very advanced in comparison with related projects and initiatives. | |
5 | +very advanced in comparison with related initiatives. | |
6 | 6 | % |
7 | 7 | For instance, the USA government has a platform designed to improve access to |
8 | -the federal government developed software\footnote{\url{https://code.gov}}. | |
9 | -Code.gov is an interface to organize the USA government projects and, in short, | |
10 | -make it easy for users and developers to obtain information and access their | |
11 | -source code repositories at GitHub. However, there are not social networking | |
12 | -and CMS features, as well as, other communication resources provided by that | |
13 | -platform. | |
8 | +federal government software\footnote{\url{https://code.gov}}. | |
9 | +Code.gov is an interface to organize USA government projects, | |
10 | +making it easy for users and developers to obtain information and to access their | |
11 | +source code repositories at GitHub. However, it does not provide social networking | |
12 | +and CMS features, as well as, other communication resources. | |
14 | 13 | |
15 | 14 | Additionally, there are two initiatives in Europe: |
16 | 15 | OSOR\footnote{\url{https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/osor}} and |
17 | 16 | OW2\footnote{\url{http://ow2.org}}. The Open Source Observatory (OSOR) is a |
18 | 17 | community hosted in the JoinUp platform powered by the European Commission. |
19 | -OSOR aims at exchanging information, experiences and best practices around the | |
20 | -use of FLOSS in the public administration. It helps to find a FLOSS made | |
21 | -available by other public administrations, providing access to information such | |
22 | -as news, events, studies and solutions related to implementation of open source | |
23 | -software. It also offers forum discussions and community mailing lists, but it | |
24 | -does not have an integrated source code repository manager and for the each | |
25 | -project there is a link to its own external repository (or its tarball file). | |
18 | +OSOR intends to exchange information, experiences, and best practices around the | |
19 | +use of FLOSS in the public administration. It supports the discovering of FLOSS projects made | |
20 | +available by public agencies, providing information about these projects, such | |
21 | +as news, events, studies, and solutions. | |
22 | +It also offers discussion forums and community mailing lists. But it | |
23 | +does not have an integrated source code repository manager, so for each | |
24 | +project there is a link to its own external repository. | |
26 | 25 | % |
27 | -OW2 is a FLOSS community to promote the development of FLOSS middleware, generic | |
28 | -business applications, cloud computing platforms and foster a community and | |
29 | -business ecosystem. In short, it aims to support the development, deployment | |
30 | -and management of distributed applications with a focus on FLOSS middleware and | |
31 | -related development and management tools. | |
32 | - | |
33 | -Moreover, in 2007 the European Comission published a study examined the impact | |
34 | -the development and distribution of FLOSS by public bodies has on eGovernment | |
35 | -services, the economy, and the information society \cite{ghosh2004}. And there | |
36 | -was between 2007 until 2011 the QualiPSo project that aimed at providing FLOSS | |
37 | -users, developers, and consumers, with quality resources and expertise on the | |
38 | -various topics related to FLOSS. The QualiPSo project also had planned to | |
39 | -develop a platform called QualiPSo Factory but it was not fully completed. | |
26 | +OW2 is an organization that promotes the development, deployment and management | |
27 | +of FLOSS middleware, generic | |
28 | +business applications, and cloud computing platforms, besides fostering a community and | |
29 | +business ecosystem around such projects. | |
30 | + | |
31 | +\leo{E aí, o que a OW2 tem a ver com o SPB?} | |
32 | + | |
33 | +Moreover, in 2007 the European Comission published a study examining the impact | |
34 | +that the development and distribution of FLOSS by public agencies have on eGovernment | |
35 | +services and the economy~\cite{ghosh2004}. And, from 2007 to 2011, there | |
36 | +was the QualiPSo project, whose objective was to provide FLOSS | |
37 | +users, developers, and consumers with resources and expertise on FLOSS quality. | |
38 | +The QualiPSo project also had planned to | |
39 | +develop a platform called QualiPSo Factory, but it was not fully completed. | |
40 | 40 | |
41 | 41 | Finally, in Latin American there is an initiative based on the SPB project |
42 | -called ``Software Publico | |
43 | -Regional''\footnote{\url{http://softwarepublicoregionalbeta.net}}. From a | |
44 | -practical point of view, it provides a customized Gitlab instance to share the | |
45 | -source code and documentation of the project from the involved countries. | |
42 | +called ``Software Público | |
43 | +Regional''\footnote{\url{http://softwarepublicoregionalbeta.net}}. | |
44 | +It provides a customized Gitlab instance to share | |
45 | +source code and documentation of projects developed by the involved countries. | |
46 | 46 | % |
47 | -Like Brazil, Chile has its own portal also called ``Software | |
48 | -Publico''\footnote{\url{http://www.softwarepublico.gob.cl}}. Users can create | |
49 | -content in the communities (news items, documents, wiki pages), but source code | |
47 | +Like Brazil, Chile has its own portal, called ``Repositorio Software | |
48 | +Público''\footnote{\url{http://www.softwarepublico.gob.cl}}. In the communities of the portal, | |
49 | +users can create content such as news, documents, and wiki pages, but source code | |
50 | 50 | repositories are available at the Bitbucket |
51 | 51 | platform\footnote{\url{https://bitbucket.org/softwarepublico}}. |
52 | 52 | |
53 | 53 | The Brazilian government needed to evolve the SPB platform that existed since |
54 | 54 | 2007. When we started this project, the SPB Portal had about 200 thousand |
55 | -registered users. For example, we could not just contact these users and ask | |
56 | -them to register an account at Github as well. Moreover, after the Edward | |
57 | -Snowden's case, the Brazilian government approved a specific law decree | |
58 | -(8.135/2013) to rule its communication services, requiring the public | |
59 | -administration to host its information systems to be provided by itself, what | |
60 | -rules out usage of private platforms, specially ones provided by foreign | |
55 | +registered users. We could not just do something like contacting these users and asking | |
56 | +them to register an account at Github. Moreover, after the Edward | |
57 | +Snowden's case, the Brazilian government issued a decree | |
58 | +(8.135/2013) requiring public | |
59 | +agencies to host their information systems by themselves, | |
60 | +avoiding the usage of private platforms, especially the ones provided by foreign | |
61 | 61 | companies. Therefore, we needed to develop our own solution to cover all the |
62 | 62 | requirements, producing a complete governmental integrated platform for |
63 | 63 | collaborative software development. |
64 | + | |
65 | +\leo{Me parece que o decreto fala sobre sistemas de comunicação. Acho que o foco era e-mail. Não me parece que o SPB tenha a ver com isso. A menos que se considere algo pelos fóruns... para refletir.} | |
66 | + | ... | ... |