Download as
Browse Code »

Commit df760de3c39ccca8090f8c5a01b7aae07817955e

Authored by Melissa Wen
1 parent 52805f25
Exists in master and in 3 other branches oss_2018, oss_2018_siqueira, rework_case_study

[icse2018] introduction review

Showing 1 changed file with 17 additions and 18 deletions   Show diff stats
icse2018/content/01-introduction.tex
  Diff comments   View file @df760de
... ... @@ -4,17 +4,16 @@
4 4 %Falar sobre mudanças estrutura organizacional organica (agil) e burocratica (tradicional)
5 5  
6 6 E-government projects are different from the others due to their complexity in
7   -terms of organizational size; resistance to changes (due to this size);
8   -innovation; impacts to end users and policies. The partnership between
9   -government and academia can be seen as a means of transferring technological
10   -knowledge for the creation of innovative e-government projects. This type of
11   -collaboration has challenges not only in the organization of the project and
12   -the alignment of objectives and rhythms, but also to overcome the high
13   -probability of failure of e-government projects. Despite the various solutions
14   -proposed to prevent these projects from failing, none of them actually seems to
15   -reduce this rate, which generates not only a waste of money but also a lack of
16   -services offered to society. Among the reasons for this failure, poor project
17   -management is one of the main.
  7 +terms of organizational size; proportional resistance to changes; innovation;
  8 +impacts to end users and policies. The partnership between government and
  9 +academia could be seen as a means of transferring technological knowledge for
  10 +the creation of innovative e-government projects. This type of collaboration has
  11 +challenges not only in the organization of the project and the alignment of
  12 +objectives and rhythms, but also to overcome the high probability of failure of
  13 +e-government projects. Despite the various solutions proposed to prevent project
  14 +failure, none of them actually seems to reduce this rate, which generates not
  15 +only a waste of money but also a lack of services offered to society. Among the
  16 +reasons for this failure, poor project management is one of the main.
18 17  
19 18 Several development processes were introduced with the intention to increase
20 19 the chances of success in software projects, the traditional and agile methods
... ... @@ -31,13 +30,13 @@ increase the chance of the project success. While industry and academia are
31 30 aligned on the use of agile methodologies for software development, the
32 31 traditional approach is still preferred by the government (?).
33 32  
34   -When government and academia resolve to come together for the development of an
35   -e-government solution, project management by institutions needs to be aligned.
36   -Changing the software development process represents a complex organizational
37   -change that impact several aspects such as structure, culture, and management
38   -practices. However, neither culture nor values ​​can be easily modified and the
39   -effort for this kind of movement does not seem feasible for development
40   -projects with tight deadlines and budgets.
  33 +When government and academia decide to come together for the development of an
  34 +e-government solution, management processes of each institution needs to be
  35 +aligned. Changing the software development process represents a complex
  36 +organizational change that impact several aspects such as structure, culture,
  37 +and management practices. However, neither culture nor values ​​can be easily
  38 +modified and the effort for this kind of movement does not seem feasible for
  39 +development projects with tight deadlines and budgets.
41 40  
42 41 In this article we present practical ways to harmonize the traditional and agile
43 42 approach in the management of a partnership project between government and
... ...