Merge Request #35
-
Signed-off-by: Carlos Oliveira <carlospecter@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro.duarte@gmail.com>
-
Signed-off-by: Carlos Oliveira <carlospecter@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Matheus Fernandes <matheus.souza.fernandes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro.duarte@gmail.com>
-
Verified in forms and user detail template if social networks are enabled, if so display these infos Signed-off-by: Carlos Oliveira <carlospecter@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro.duarte@gmail.com>
-
Signed-off-by: Carlos Oliveira <carlospecter@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro.duarte@gmail.com>
-
@msfernandes @alexandrealmeidabarbosa Please, review these commits.
-
1 - All tests running without error. 2 - Flake8 passed. 3 - I gave some suggestions about the code style.
About the feature: The feature looks ok, however when I compared the behaviour of the new feature with the old one I noticed some differences. Following: 1 - If you disable the social network, it is ok. 2 - If you enable the social network, something is different from "beta". You cannot see the social network in your profile, however, in the old version you could. Please, take a look at the picture attached in this message to make clear the problem. @carlospecter @kanashiro.duarte
-
It was missing a context processor in order to properly treat whether social networks are enabled or not.
-
I don't think that's the best approach for user profile customization. In fact that just allow us to disable/enable a bunch of fields. That's ok for now but I'd you guys to starting thinking further ;)
-
Guys, this MR is full of changes not related with the feature. If that's not a MR meant to be a major refactor please try to stick to feature you are working on. I'm waiting for a full review on this without unrelated changes.
-
Removed unrelated stuff and protected methods. Ran the tests, it's all OK. About the flake8 warning, an issue will be opened to discuss this subject.