Commit eadcd278bedd4d83a9e0e5b0bb6285cccc16ac7f
1 parent
b9e040f8
Exists in
spb-stable
and in
3 other branches
Bring back 'Authorization for Merge Requests'
This text was deleted in 564c37d9b69367fb7384a22edad53c8e75aeb2cb.
Showing
1 changed file
with
34 additions
and
0 deletions
Show diff stats
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ | @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ | ||
1 | +# Authorization for Merge Requests | ||
2 | + | ||
3 | +There are two main ways to have a merge request flow with GitLab: working with protected branches in a single repository, or working with forks of an authoritative project. | ||
4 | + | ||
5 | +## Protected branch flow | ||
6 | + | ||
7 | +With the protected branch flow everybody works within the same GitLab project. | ||
8 | +The project maintainers get Master access and the regular developers get Developer access. | ||
9 | +The maintainers mark the authoritative branches as 'Protected'. | ||
10 | +The developers push feature branches to the project and create merge requests to have their feature branches reviewed and merged into one of the protected branches. | ||
11 | +Only users with Master access can merge changes into a protected branch. | ||
12 | + | ||
13 | +### Advantages | ||
14 | + | ||
15 | +- fewer projects means less clutter | ||
16 | +- developers need to consider only one remote repository | ||
17 | + | ||
18 | +### Disadvantages | ||
19 | + | ||
20 | +- manual setup of protected branch required for each new project | ||
21 | + | ||
22 | +## Forking workflow | ||
23 | + | ||
24 | +With the forking workflow the maintainers get Master access and the regular developers get Reporter access to the authoritative repository, which prohibits them from pushing any changes to it. | ||
25 | +Developers create forks of the authoritative project and push their feature branches to their own forks. | ||
26 | +To get their changes into master they need to create a merge request across forks. | ||
27 | + | ||
28 | +### Advantages | ||
29 | + | ||
30 | +- in an appropriately configured GitLab group, new projects automatically get the required access restrictions for regular developers: fewer manual steps to configure authorization for new projects | ||
31 | + | ||
32 | +### Disadvantages | ||
33 | + | ||
34 | +- the project need to keep their forks up to date, which requires more advanced Git skills (managing multiple remotes) |