21 Oct, 2013

1 commit


09 Oct, 2013

1 commit


10 Sep, 2013

1 commit


08 Aug, 2013

1 commit


04 Aug, 2013

2 commits


30 Jul, 2013

1 commit


27 Jul, 2013

1 commit


17 Jul, 2013

1 commit

  • The good:
    
     - You can do a merge request for a forked commit and it will merge properly (i.e. it does work).
     - Push events take into account merge requests on forked projects
     - Tests around merge_actions now present, spinach, and other rspec tests
     - Satellites now clean themselves up rather then recreate
    
    The questionable:
    
     - Events only know about target projects
     - Project's merge requests only hold on to MR's where they are the target
     - All operations performed in the satellite
    
    The bad:
    
      -  Duplication between project's repositories and satellites (e.g. commits_between)
    
    (for reference: http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3456722-merge-requests-between-projects-repos)
    
    Fixes:
    
    Make test repos/satellites only create when needed
    -Spinach/Rspec now only initialize test directory, and setup stubs (things that are relatively cheap)
    -project_with_code, source_project_with_code, and target_project_with_code now create/destroy their repos individually
    -fixed remote removal
    -How to merge renders properly
    -Update emails to show project/branches
    -Edit MR doesn't set target branch
    -Fix some failures on editing/creating merge requests, added a test
    -Added back a test around merge request observer
    -Clean up project_transfer_spec, Remove duplicate enable/disable observers
    -Ensure satellite lock files are cleaned up, Attempted to add some testing around these as well
    -Signifant speed ups for tests
    -Update formatting ordering in notes_on_merge_requests
    -Remove wiki schema update
    Fixes for search/search results
    -Search results was using by_project for a list of projects, updated this to use in_projects
    -updated search results to reference the correct (target) project
    -udpated search results to print both sides of the merge request
    
    Change-Id: I19407990a0950945cc95d62089cbcc6262dab1a8
    Izaak Alpert
     

13 Jul, 2013

1 commit


23 Jun, 2013

1 commit


01 Apr, 2013

1 commit


31 Mar, 2013

2 commits


03 Feb, 2013

1 commit


27 Jan, 2013

1 commit


15 Jan, 2013

1 commit


25 Dec, 2012

1 commit


18 Nov, 2012

1 commit


31 Oct, 2012

1 commit


09 Oct, 2012

1 commit


02 Aug, 2012

1 commit


02 Jul, 2012

2 commits


24 Jun, 2012

1 commit


03 Jun, 2012

1 commit


30 May, 2012

2 commits


03 Apr, 2012

1 commit


22 Feb, 2012

1 commit


15 Feb, 2012

1 commit


14 Feb, 2012

1 commit


12 Feb, 2012

1 commit


25 Jan, 2012

1 commit


12 Jan, 2012

1 commit


28 Dec, 2011

1 commit


27 Dec, 2011

2 commits


26 Dec, 2011

1 commit

  • It matches #[0-9]+ in commit messages.
    For example
     * Fix for #12
     * Code review for #56
     * Test for #15, Review on #54, Fix for #42
    
     It only links to valid issues (existing and belonging to the current project)
     It does not add any link to the commit in the issue page, it only consists in parsing the commit message when displayed.
    
     This can be considere as a primary work for the issue #155 on gitlabhq/gitlabhq.
    Cedric Gatay
     

13 Dec, 2011

1 commit