Commit 613c980ce78c48aeee62a5fe283e53b1e7b1f32b
1 parent
381a8210
Exists in
master
Review of conclusion text
Showing
1 changed file
with
17 additions
and
19 deletions
Show diff stats
opensym2017/content/12-conclusion.tex
... | ... | @@ -5,34 +5,32 @@ In this paper we present and discuss issues experienced during a government- |
5 | 5 | funded project, in partnership with University of Brasilia and University of |
6 | 6 | São Paulo, to evolve the Brazilian Public Software portal. |
7 | 7 | |
8 | -The contributions of this paper are twofold. First, we present how was | |
9 | -developed an unprecedent platform, delivered to Brazilian government. This | |
10 | -platform - developed by an heterogenous team of professors, master and | |
8 | +The contributions of this paper are twofold. First, we present how an unprecedent | |
9 | +platform was developed and delivered to Brazilian government. This | |
10 | +platform - developed by an heterogenous team of professors, masters and | |
11 | 11 | undergraduate students, IT professionals and governmental managers - provides |
12 | 12 | several modern features from the integration of more than 10 FLOSS systems. |
13 | 13 | |
14 | -Second, the 30 months project which developed this platform results in an | |
15 | -important case that it is possible to mitigate issues seen as conflicting to IT | |
16 | -development environment and between industry and academy. We shown that, as | |
17 | -long as the institution can provide a healthy and challenging environment to | |
18 | -its students, its is possible to conciliate studies and professional training | |
14 | +Second, the thirty-month long project in which the SPB platform was developed points | |
15 | +out that it is possible to mitigate issues seen as conflicting to the IT | |
16 | +development environment and between industry and academy. The team was engaged in | |
17 | +providing a friendly working environment as well as in showing to governmental agents | |
18 | +another way to interact with the FLOSS community and the university. In the paper, | |
19 | +we try to show that, as long as the institution can provide a healthy and challenging | |
20 | +environment to its students, one may conciliate studies and professional training | |
19 | 21 | in universities. After the end of the project, some students successfully |
20 | 22 | embraced opportunities in public and private sectos, within national borders |
21 | 23 | and abroad. Some others went further and started their own companies. |
22 | -We also shown that, with some adaptations/"translation processes", was possible | |
23 | -to conciliate agile methodologies and FOSS practices to develop software to | |
24 | +We also demonstrate that, with some adaptations/"translation processes", it is feasible | |
25 | +to conciliate agile methodologies and FOSS practices in order to develop software to | |
24 | 26 | governmental organizations with functional hierarchical structures that use |
25 | 27 | traditional development paradigm. |
26 | 28 | |
27 | -In the SPB project it was employed many of our beliefs about FLOSS and Agile | |
28 | -practices. The team was engaged in creating a friendly environment for everyone | |
29 | -involved in the project and in showing to government agents another way to | |
30 | -interact with the FLOSS community and the university. With an open work style, | |
31 | -the project has seeked to be transparent for the whole society. We belive it is | |
32 | -still needed to analyze every data produced by the project and its impact on the | |
33 | -students. For future work, we would conduce a \textit{post-mortem} analyse in the | |
34 | -project, seeing that we have many open data to be explored and it was applied | |
35 | -approachs which still need extra validation. | |
29 | +Future work should use the many data produced by the project to validate and evaluate | |
30 | +how the used FLOSS and Agile practices have impacted the students and also the | |
31 | +governmental development process. For this, we would conduce a \textit{post-mortem} | |
32 | +analyse using the project open data and a survey targeted the involved actors. | |
33 | + | |
36 | 34 | |
37 | 35 | The portal is available at \url{softwarepublico.gov.br}. All |
38 | 36 | documentation, including detailed architecture and operation manuals are | ... | ... |