[oss-2018] todo about Fabio - related works and research design

Melissa Wen
1 parent 00ede063
Showing 2 changed files with 51 additions and 11 deletions Show diff stats
oss2018/content/02-relatedwork.tex
oss2018/content/03-methods.tex
@@ -10,6 +10,11 @@
 %sobre FLOSS e talvez possam dizer que a gente não se 'enquadra' na conferência.
 %Não acho que precisamos tirar a parte 'agile', mas precisamos ser mais conciso
 %sobre isso
+
+%Sugestão do Fabio: Colocar referências de trabalho que conseguiram conciliar
+%ou que reportam dificuldade em conciliar ou aplicar processos de gerenciamento
+%em um projeto de colaboração
+
 Discussions on how to introduce new management methods into an organization are
 present in several papers.  Nerur et al. identify the critical issues that involve
 migrating from traditional to agile by comparing main practices of the two
@@ -2,28 +2,32 @@
 \label{sec:researchdesign}
 The focus of this paper is investigating practical ways to conciliate cultural
-differences in software development process between government and academia,
+differences in software development processes between government and academia,
 without modifying their internal processes. Our analysis was guided by the
 following research questions:
-\textbf{RQ1.}\textit{What practices based on open source development experiences would
-help to combine teams with different management processes in a
+\textbf{RQ1.}\textit{How to introduce open source and agile best practices into
 government-academia collaboration project?}
-
-\textbf{RQ2.}\textit{How do open source development practices benefit the process of
-developing an e-government platform in a government-academia collaboration?}
+\textbf{RQ2.}\textit{What practices would favor effective team management in
+government-academia collaborative project?}
 To answer these questions, we use as a case study the evolution project of the
 SPB portal \cite{meirelles2017spb}, a government-academia collaborative
 development based on open source software integration. We designed two surveys
 and an interview to the different roles performed by the project
-participants and collect public data from the project development environment
-available on the developed platform itself. Our research approach is detailed
-in the following subsections.
+participants and we collected public data from the project development
+environment. Our research approach is detailed in the following subsections.
 \subsection{The case study}
+%TODO:
+%Apresentar melhor a SPB plataforma aqui para preparar a discussão dos resultados (usar modelo IEEE Software)
+
+%TODO por parágrafo
+%five existing open source software (substitutir software por systems)
+%systems-of-sytems software (Colab) (substitutir software por framework)
+
 The project to evolve the Brazilian Public Software Portal was a partnership
 between government and academia held between 2014 and 2016
 \cite{meirelles2017spb}. To solve maintenance problems and fill design-reality
@@ -36,6 +40,10 @@ including social networking (Noosfero), mailing lists (MailMan), version
 control system (GitLab), and source code quality monitoring (Mezuro), all
 integrated using a system-of-systems software (Colab) \cite{meirelles2017spb}.
+%Não usar empirical practices => best practices
+%undergraduate students => undergraduate interns
+%Colocar no discurso direto: The project hired 6 IT profectionals, and 2 designers.
+
 The academic team carried out development activities in the Advanced Laboratory
 of Production, Research and Innovation in Software Engineering (LAPPIS) at UnB.
 The project management and development process in this laboratory are usually
@@ -45,14 +53,20 @@ professors participated in the development team. Six IT professionals were also
 hired as senior developers due to their experiences in open source projects and
 two designers specialized in User eXperience. 
+%(Melhorar a frase) Although they were responsible... Sugestão de sequência: theses government servants did not develop software. Their responsability was contracting...
+
 The government team was composed of one director, one coordinator, and two IT
-analysts from a department of MPOG. Although they were responsible for the
+analysts from MPOG. Although they were responsible for the
 execution of this collaboration, their department generally does not execute
 development of ministry's software projects, since its responsibility is
 contracting and homologating software development services, following
 traditional management approaches, such as the RUP, CMMI, and PMBOK.
-% Conteúdo OK melhorar construção
+%Met in person to manage... 
+%To improve the project management process we have adopted and evolute a set of empirical practices based on open source ecosystems and agile methodologies, establishing an empirical management model.
+%Melhorar frase como um todo tirando o 'we' (diferenciar autor (we) do coordenador do projeto): To improve the project management process we have adopted and evolved a set of empirical practices based on open source ecosystems and agile methodologies, establishing an empirical management model. 
+%Sugestão de conteúdo para finalizar a última frase
+%"Ao longo do projeto, os seus responsáveis foram experimentando e testando práticas coletadas do OSS de forma intuitiva e não-sistemática. Neste paper tentamos analisar e sistematizar essas melhores práticas."
 The leaders of these two aforementioned teams periodically met in person for
 the purpose of managing the project progress, discussing strategic and
 technical goals. Initially, these meetings took place at the ministry's
@@ -68,6 +82,12 @@ management model.
 \subsection{Survey and data collection}
+%UnB undergraduate interns
+%Online questionnaire (Não usar survey, usar sempre questionnaire)
+%We also interviewed 
+%The questions are classified into categories
+%tirar "in the context of government and project;"
+
 We divided the UnB development team into two groups of target participants
 according to their roles during the project: \textit{UnB Interns} and
 \textit{Senior Developers}. For each group, we designed an online survey with
@@ -80,6 +100,12 @@ Organization, communication and development methodologies in the context of
 government and project; Satisfaction with the developed platform; Lessons
 learned.
+%UnB interns (undergraduate students) => interns
+%their average age [in september 2017] are...
+%arredondar as casas das porcentagem, nada depois da virgula 43,2% => 43%
+%falar as porcentagens sobre a profissão de todos inclusive teacher and public servants
+%link to online questionnaire throught e-mail
+
 We sent the link to the online survey through emails to 42 UnB interns
 (undergraduate students), who participated in any time of the project as
 developer receiving a scholarship. We received a total of 37 responses. Their
@@ -90,6 +116,9 @@ are entrepreneurs, 8.1\% are unemployed and the others work as teachers or
 civil servants. 43.2\% said the SPB project was their first experience with
 open source software.
+%We also invited the 8 seniors developers to filling the oline questionnaire and all of them did.
+%They average age are
+
 We also sent the link to the online survey through emails to eight senior
 developers (IT professionals). All of them answered the questionnaire.
 Their average age is 32 years old and 87.5\% are male. They have an average of
@@ -100,12 +129,18 @@ companies and participated in 4 to 80 projects. They participated in this
 collaborative project between 7 to 24 months. 85.7\% of them had some
 experience with free software before the SPB project.
+
 Two MPOG IT analysts were interviewed separately.  Each interview took an
 average of 2 hours with 28 open questions. They are more than 30 years old and
 have been government employees for more than 7 years.  Only one of them
 continues working in the same ministry. For both, this collaborative project
 was their first experience of government-academia development collaboration.
+%We collected from the repository manager all open issues and commits.
+%We collected from the main project repository all the issues and commits.
+%The number of comment authors
+%In the main project repository
+
 Finally, we quantitatively analyze data about the development of the project,
 publicly available on the SPB platform. We collected from the repository
 manager tool of the platform all open issues and commits related to the main