Download as
Browse Code »

Commit 00ede0637651157e22bd7bf37cc97df02f8abd70

Authored by Melissa Wen
1 parent 25ab9f4a
Exists in master and in 3 other branches oss_2018, oss_2018_siqueira, rework_case_study

[oss-2018] collaborative review of introduction

Showing 1 changed file with 23 additions and 31 deletions   Show diff stats
oss2018/content/01-introduction.tex
  Diff comments   View file @00ede06
1 1 \section{Introduction}
2 2  
3   -% TODO: Para refletir
4   -% IMO eu acho que temos que reduzir ao máximos os ganchos com agile, uma vez que
5   -% a conferência é sobre FLOSS e falar muito de agile pode fazer com que o
6   -% revisor diga que isto não se enquadra com a conferência.
7 3 E-government projects differ from others due to their complexity and extension
8   -\cite{anthopoulos2016egovernment}. They are complicated because they combine
  4 +\cite{anthopoulos2016egovernment}. They are complex because they combine
9 5 construction, innovation, information \& communications technologies, politics,
10   -and social impact. The extension, on the other hand, is related to their scope,
11   -target audience, organizational size, time and the corresponding resistance to
12   -change. Government-academia research is an alternative to conduct e-government
13   -projects and to meet the needs of society. This collaborative work has
14   -challenges, such as align goals during the project organization, pace
15   -synchronization between government and academia
16   -\cite{anthopoulos2016egovernment}, and overcome the failure trend of
17   -e-government projects \cite{goldfinch2007pessimism}.
  6 +and social impact. Their extension, on the other hand, is related to their scope,
  7 +target audience, organizational size, time, and the corresponding resistance to
  8 +change. Government-academia collaborative projects can be considered an
  9 +alternative to create novelty for e-government projects and to meet the needs of
  10 +society. This collaborative work has challenges, such as organizing the
  11 +collaboration project, aligning goals, synchronizing the pace of between
  12 +government and academia \cite{anthopoulos2016egovernment}, and overcoming the
  13 +failure trend of e-government projects \cite{goldfinch2007pessimism}.
18 14  
19   -% TODO: Veja se não mudei muito o sentido de forma a prejudicar
20   -% Eu tirei o 'increases' da segunda frase uma vez que nós não temos evidências disto
21 15 Poor project management is one of the main reasons why e-government projects
22   -fail \cite{anthopoulos2016egovernment}. In Brazil, while the academia is
23   -researching modern techniques related to open source and software development,
24   -the government still using traditional methods to discipline their software
25   -development. When government and academia combine efforts to develop an
26   -e-government solution, the differences in the project management become an
27   -issue. Changing the development process in a large-size institution represents
  16 +fail \cite{anthopoulos2016egovernment}. When government and academia combine
  17 +efforts to develop an e-government solution, the differences in the project
  18 +management become an issue. Academia commonly work on cutting edge of
  19 +technology while government is still relying on traditional techniques.
  20 +Changing the development process in large-size institutions represents
28 21 an organizational disturbance which impacts on structure, culture, and
29 22 management practices \cite{nerur2015challenges}. As a result, government and
30 23 academia have to harmonize their view to increasing the chances of success in
31 24 projects with tight deadlines and short budgets.
32 25  
33   -% TODO: Revisar, tentei deixar mais claro a contribuição do trabalho
34   -% Eu tirei alguns detalhes do survey uma vez que este será detalhado mais na frente
35   -% Além disto, acredito que o importante é deixar a menssagem desse artigo clara
36   -% e direta na introdução.
37   -This work contribute by extracting a set of practices from open source
38   -ecosystems that helped to harmonize the differences between government and
39   -academia. We investigated a 30-month government-academia project with the
40   -purpose of tracing project management practices based on open source
41   -ecosystems. We validated the benefits by collecting data from repository
42   -management tools used by the project, and we surveyed project participants.
  26 +% TODO: Projetos de sl tem x características e muitas de suas práticas tem se mostrado válidas e que abrem precedentes para utilizar no contexto governo academia. Falar da influência do SL no projeto
  27 +
  28 +In this work we investigate a set of practices from a 30-month
  29 +government-academia project that helped to harmonize the differences between
  30 +government and academia management cultures. We trace the best practices based
  31 +on open source ecosystems and agile methodologies. Finally, we validate their
  32 +benefits by collecting data from the main project repository and by surveying
  33 +the project participant points of view.
  34 +
... ...