Commit 95470a8b77dd6fbb72c3844a1b7d2aaab92733ab

Authored by Paulo Meireles
1 parent 70ac3cc8

Moving to UX section

OSS-2017/03-architecture.tex
... ... @@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
1   -\section{Architecture}
2   -
3   -%TODO: Kanashiro
4   -
5   -The SPB platform was deployed in 7 virtual machines with different functions,
6   -as we can see in Figure \ref{fig:architecture}.
7   -
8   -\begin{figure}[hbt]
9   - \centering
10   - \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/arquitetura.png}
11   - \caption{SPB Architecture.}
12   - \label{fig:architecture}
13   -\end{figure}
14   -
15   -The \textit{reverseproxy} handles the HTTP requests and redirects them to the
16   -\textit{integration}, the \textit{email} sends and receives e-mails on behalf
17   -of the platform and the \textit{monitor} keeps the entire environment tracked.
18   -These three \textit{VMs} mentioned - \textit{reverseproxy}, \textit{email} and
19   -\textit{monitor} - are accessible via Internet and the other ones are only
20   -available in the local network created between them.
21   -
22   -\textit{Integration} works as a second layer of proxy beneath
23   -\textit{reverseproxy}, any request to the platform will be handled by it. The
24   -Colab service provides interface, authentication and search engine integration
25   -among all the services. When a request is received to a specific service,
26   -Colab authenticates the user in the target tool, sends the request and makes a
27   -visual transformation in the HTML page, which is the content of the response.
28   -Another user-oriented feature is the integrated search engine, when the user
29   -want to find something in the platform Colab will perform the search in the
30   -whole databases. Colab itself provides a web interface for GNU Mailman and we
31   -have two others integrated tools in \textit{integration}: Gitlab and Prezento.
32   -Gitlab provides web interface for Git repositories and issues tracker, and
33   -Prezento is a front-end for source code static analysis.
34   -
35   -The source code static analysis is performed by \textit{mezuro}. It runs some
36   -static analysis tools on source code stored in repository and provides this data
37   -to Prezento. A social network and CMS (Content Management System) is provided by
38   -Noosfero in \textit{social}, and the databases of all tools with a cache
39   -service are in \textit{database}.
OSS-2017/03-ux.tex 0 → 100644
... ... @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
  1 +\section{User Experience evolution}
  2 +
  3 +The integration of collaborative environments goes beyond functional aspects.
  4 +Offering the population an unified experience across these environments has
  5 +been the key to encourage the use of the platform as it reduces the perception
  6 +of the complexity.
  7 +
  8 +Thus, the portal information architecture was redesigned to provide a
  9 +transparent navigation and to reach users with different profiles. A process
  10 +of harmonization has been employed on the interaction models of each tool in
  11 +order to reduce the learning curve. At the same time, a new visual style was
  12 +created to unify the navigation experience and to comply with the guidelines of
  13 +the digital communication identity pattern established by the Federal
  14 +Government.
  15 +
  16 +With the increase of the system features and the addition of new tools, the
  17 +visual style has steadily evolved in order to keep the navigation unified.
  18 +Moreover, tools from different backgrounds, which in many cases run
  19 +functionalities with similar concepts, made us face the challenge of developing
  20 +a transparent interface that unifies various context. For each required
  21 +feature, we often have to conciliate data with distinct structure and
  22 +information pattern from each used tool. The interface was the meeting point
  23 +for this data with links that users will not notice. The most common features
  24 +(i.e. search, display and edition of profile information and content) have been
  25 +brought in line with the structure and other existing features of the portal.
  26 +
  27 +The other challenge is related to responsive web design. The portal interface
  28 +and each of its pages were designed following the bounds of responsiveness
  29 +provided or supported by each tools. In particular, in the case of Noosfero,
  30 +which do not have any official branch dedicated to improve its responsiveness,
  31 +our project needed to engage with the expansion of this platform, where we made
  32 +a lot of contributions and dialogues with the community and maintainers. All
  33 +the project members got involved in the study, design and development of the
  34 +Noosfero's new interface which support a responsive web design and that have
  35 +not yet been completed.
  36 +
  37 +Users are part of the process. In 2014, a survey among users of the existing
  38 +platform was conducted to identify usability problems and to measure their
  39 +satisfaction with the system. After the release of the new SPB platform,
  40 +several validations activities were implemented in 2015 and 2016, and the data
  41 +collected during this phase helped to channel our efforts to identify and to
  42 +improve the main fields of the new system. The aim was to bring the users
  43 +closer to features that they have more interest and designing a navigation
  44 +which deepens in accordance with the user's depth of knowledge.
... ...
OSS-2017/spb.tex
... ... @@ -40,10 +40,10 @@
40 40 \input{00-abstract}
41 41 \input{01-introduction}
42 42 \input{02-platform}
43   -\input{03-architecture}
  43 +\input{03-ux}
44 44 \input{04-finals}
45 45  
46 46 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
47   -\bibliographystyle{splncs03}
48   -\bibliography{spb}
  47 +%\bibliographystyle{splncs03}
  48 +%\bibliography{spb}
49 49 \end{document}
... ...