Commit 0a0c3ca49dbaec5980d3262c41a8a72977a51efb
1 parent
7c31d240
Exists in
master
and in
3 other branches
[oss-2018] abstract
Showing
1 changed file
with
9 additions
and
10 deletions
Show diff stats
oss2018/content/00-abstract.tex
| 1 | \begin{abstract} | 1 | \begin{abstract} |
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | -In this paper, we examined the case of a 30-month government-academia | ||
| 4 | -development collaboration to map empirical practices that harmonized the | ||
| 5 | -differences in open source software project management on both sides. We | ||
| 6 | -evidence our adopted practices from the data collected on the repository | ||
| 7 | -management tool of the developed platform itself. The benefits of the created empirical | ||
| 8 | -management model in this project are revealed by the results of surveys | ||
| 9 | -with participants on both sides of the project. These results suggest the | ||
| 10 | -adoption of empirical practices based on open source ecosystems and agile | ||
| 11 | -methodologies to improve the software development in context with different | ||
| 12 | -organizational culture and people mindset. | 3 | +Government and academia can collaborate on bringing innovation and filling |
| 4 | +design-reality gaps in e-government projects. However, differences in the | ||
| 5 | +methods employed by these organizations in project management could be a | ||
| 6 | +challenge for collaborative works. Bearing that in mind, we investigated a | ||
| 7 | +30-month government-academia partnership case to find appropriate ways to | ||
| 8 | +get around this obstacle. The analisis of \textit{post-mortem} data and the | ||
| 9 | +results of a survey with participants of this project allowed us to present | ||
| 10 | +a set of best open source practices that favors team management in | ||
| 11 | +collaborations between the abovementioned organizations. | ||
| 13 | 12 | ||
| 14 | \end{abstract} | 13 | \end{abstract} |
| 15 | 14 |