Download as
Browse Code »

Commit 1000b14ee2c65ec594eb56eb780882b237f7cefb

Authored by Paulo Meireles
1 parent cc91fad4
Exists in master and in 2 other branches oss_2018, rework_case_study

[oss-2018] Minor fixes

Showing 2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions   Show diff stats
oss2018/content/03-methods.tex
  Diff comments   View file @1000b14
... ... @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ questions that guided our work:
12 12 \textbf{RQ1. }\textit{How to introduce open source and agile best practices into
13 13 government-academia collaboration projects?}
14 14  
15   -\textbf{RQ2. }\textit{What practices would favor effective team management in
  15 +\textbf{RQ2. }\textit{What practices favor effective team management in
16 16 government-academia collaborative projects?}
17 17  
18 18 To answer these questions, we use the case study as research method. We selected
... ...
oss2018/content/04-results.tex
  Diff comments   View file @1000b14
... ... @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ practices that made these decisions concrete. We use data collected from the
23 23 central repository to map best practices and, with the respondents' answers, we
24 24 analyzed how each decision benefited the project collaboration.
25 25  
26   -The development team decides to \textbf{use of the system under development to
  26 +The development team decided to \textbf{use of the system under development to
27 27 develop the system itself}. The team released the first version of the new SPB
28 28 portal nine months after the project beginning. Due to the platform features
29 29 for software development and social network, the development coordinators decided to
... ... @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ well as in the portal itself. When necessary, we can access the tools and find
79 79 out how we develop a solution. We can recover these positive points.''}.
80 80  
81 81  
82   -The development coordinator works to \textbf{brings together government staff
  82 +The development coordinators worked to \textbf{brings together government staff
83 83 and development team}. At the beginning of the project, the interviewed MPOG
84 84 analysts did not participate in any direct interaction with any university
85 85 representative, even though they were the ones in charge of the government in
... ... @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ qualified, the code had quality, and the project was well executed. So in
133 133 practice, our difficulty interpreting the technical details did not impact
134 134 release planning.''}.
135 135  
136   -The technical leaders \textbf{divide the development team into priority fronts,
  136 +The project leaders \textbf{divided the development team into priority fronts,
137 137 and for each one, hire at least one specialist from the IT market}. The
138 138 development team had four work areas divided by the main demands of the
139 139 project: User Experience, DevOps, Integration of Systems, and Social
... ... @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ their previous experiences. In contrast, {62.5\%} of them did not understand
158 158 the MPOG's project management process and {50\%} believed this process could
159 159 affect their project productivity.
160 160  
161   -Senior developers were also responsible for \textbf{improving the management
  161 +The senior developers were also responsible for \textbf{improving the management
162 162 and technical knowledge} of the interns about practices from industry and open
163 163 source projects. {91\%} of the interns believed that working with professionals
164 164 was essential for learning. Working with senior developers was important during
... ...